-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 4 pull requests #114144
Rollup of 4 pull requests #114144
Conversation
The purpose of the test is to make sure that compiling hello world produces no compiler output. To properly test that, we need to run the entire compiler pipeline. We don't want the test to pass if codegen accidentally starts writing to stdout. So keep it as build-pass.
This reverts commit 13e2abf. Reverting because an MCP was requested and it turned out there was a lack of a consensus on what to do in this area.
rust-lang#113780 should have gone through an MCP+FCP but wasn't, but instead of reverting the original PR, this PR just make that new option unstable.
…henkov tests/ui/hello_world/main.rs: Remove FIXME (rust-lang#62277) The purpose of the test is to make sure that compiling hello world produces no compiler output. To properly test that, we need to run the entire compiler pipeline. We don't want the test to pass if codegen accidentally starts writing to stdout. So keep it as build-pass. Part of rust-lang#62277
…ck-issue-12345, r=jackh726 Revert "add tidy check that forbids issue ui test filenames" This reverts commit 13e2abf. Reverting because an MCP was requested and it turned out there was a lack of a consensus on what to do in this area.
…e, r=jackh726 Make `--print` with path unstable rust-lang#113780 should have gone through an MCP+FCP but wasn't, but instead of reverting the original PR, this PR just make that new option unstable. [Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202023-07-27/near/379199738) cc `@dtolnay`
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 0be1152311 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
...Somehow this rollup claimed it merged #97571 in successfully but it did not. The diffs are not on master. |
Finished benchmarking commit (500647f): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 654.49s -> 654.841s (0.05%) |
Successful merges:
compile-pass
tests tocheck-pass
orbuild-pass
#62277))--print
with path unstable #114139 (Make--print
with path unstable)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup